Do you subscribe to TV service from the local cable company?

If so, you probably don’t need to worry. If you are a cable TV subscriber, no additional equipment beyond what you are using now should be necessary to continue viewing local stations. However, depending upon what type of programming package you subscribe to, you might not be able to view these channels exactly as they are broadcast using the new DTV standard. Cable companies often offer a cheap “basic cable” tier, which is only available in analog. While you won’t need any new equipment to continue viewing programming, you may also not be getting a high-quality digital picture in such a programming tier. If you want to watch local TV stations in High-Definition (HDTV), you will need an HDTV ready TV tuner. This is assuming that there are local stations in your area that offer HDTV programming and that the cable company passes this signal along without down-converting it to a picture of lesser quality. Call your cable TV provider to see if HDTV programming is indeed available in your area.

Do you subscribe to TV service from DirecTV or DISH Networks?

In 90% of the country, DirecTV and DISH Networks offer local TV channels via satellite. If this is the case, you should not need any additional equipment to continue viewing local TV stations. If you happen to live in a rural area (like where we live in Humboldt County) you might be out of luck when it comes to receiving local TV stations via satellite, since neither DISH nor DirecTV carry them. If you want to watch local TV stations in addition to satellite programming, you will need separate equipment. Keep reading for more info. HDTV programming is available in selected markets. You will need an HDTV capable TV if you want to watch these channels in high-definition though.

Do you have an outdoor TV antenna?

If you have an outdoor TV antenna that is mounted on a mast or other structure, you will need to make sure that it is capable of picking up UHF TV signals in addition to the “old” VHF band. Stations will be using different frequencies for the broadcast of digital television signals. Most of them will be in the UHF band. If your current antenna only picks-up (old) channels 2-13, you will likely need to upgrade to a new antenna.

Do you use “rabbit ears” to receive local TV stations?

Unfortunately, most people who currently receive a strong signal via rabbit ears or an antenna that is built-in to many older TV sets will need to upgrade to an outdoor antenna in order to continue receiving over-the-air signals. Why? Because many local TV stations are now broadcasting DTV signals using less power than they did before. Plus, the new digital television standard does not perform well at all in weak-reception situations. If you had marginal analog TV reception before, you will likely have NO digital TV reception now. Find a qualified, local installer for advice on what type of antenna you will need.

Do you have a newer, HDTV-ready TV set?

If so, congratulations! You should be able to watch local TV stations in both DTV and HDTV formats, assuming that you have an antenna that can receive signals from local TV stations reliably. HDTV reception is only available from stations that broadcast in high-definition. With others, you will receive DTV programming in standard digital TV resolution. The new DTV standard gives a better quality picture than you would receive in analog, but it isn’t the same thing as HDTV.

Do you have an older, analog TV set?

This is where things start to get expensive. Most TV sets that are more than 2-3 years old only receive channels in analog format. They are not capable of receiving digital television signals over the air without a special converter box. HDTV is not viewable on older, analog TV sets, due to their design. So, if you want high-definition, you will need to buy a new HDTV-ready TV set. If you wish to continue receiving broadcast television stations that have converted their signals to digital, you will need to purchase a DTV converter box. These are sold in electronics and appliance stores, and range in price from around $50 to well over $200. Pricing generally depends upon what type of extra features are available. Many have built-in program guides and other bells and whistles that will increase the cost. The converter box needs to be connected between your TV set and an external antenna. If you have an antenna built-in to your TV set, you will need to purchase a new outdoor antenna or an indoor antenna that is capable of receiving very weak signals. Regardless of your location, an outdoor antenna is always the better choice.

How do I know which channels I can receive?

Newer HDTV-ready TV sets and DTV converter boxes can scan all available frequencies to find what channels are available to you in digital or analog formats. If you have scanned through all available frequencies and not found any channels, you will likely need a better antenna and/or amplifier to improve your reception. There is no guarantee that you will be able to continue viewing your local stations. New transmitters may be using less power or be aiming the signal in a different direction than they were previously. Unfortunately, the only way to know for sure if you will be able to receive a signal is trial-and-error. There is no foolproof method of determining what signals will be available to you beforehand.

What type of antenna do I need?

If you have to ask, you probably should rely on a professional to pick an antenna for you. Retailers such as Radio Shack are typically NOT the best place to go to for advice. In many cases, you will be dealing with salespeople who know little more than you do about TV reception. So, unless you happen to know one of these people personally, I would not recommend relying upon their advice. Your best source of information is local TV antenna installer. Look in the yellow pages under “television” or “antennas” to find one. If you don’t see any listings in your area, the best place to look is in the listings for “satellite television”. Most professional TV antenna installers also install satellite TV equipment. Chances are that any company that has been in the business for 10+ years or installs C-Band or FTA (free-to-air) receivers either installs local TV antennas as well, or knows of someone who does. It is definitely worth a phone call. If you still can’t find anyone locally, I would suggest contacting a mail-order provider that specializes in selling antennas and that has technicians available to give advice. One retailer I would highly recommend is Solid Signal.

What else will I need?

Depending upon your location, you may need an external amplifier or amplified antenna in order to continue receiving a watchable TV signal.These are generally available at Radio Shack or other electronics retailers. If you are installing an outdoor antenna for the first time, you will also need to purchase an appropriate length of coaxial cable to connect the antenna to the TV or DTV converter box. High-quality, well-shielded RG-6 is usually the best bet when it comes to cable. We recommend using cable made by quality manufacturers, such as Belden. It is definitely worth the extra few cents per foot to purchase high-quality cable.

Be sure to check out the rest of our website at HDTV for more information on the digital TV transition, including tips on antennas, where to get free coupons for DTV converter boxes and much more.

I’ve most likely read over 100 articles that have been written about the conversion to digital television over the past two weeks. These stories have ranged from a couple of sentences in a small-town newspaper to a feature story in the New York Times. They are all remarkably similar in nature, unfortunately. Poorly researched, uninformative and in some cases little more than a flimsy literary excuse for writing copy that pushes their own, personal political agendas. There seems to be very little that is professional about professional journalism these days. Is it any wonder that more and more Americans are turning to such outlets as blogs, Twitter and even entertainment shows for their “news fix” and are increasingly turning their backs on traditional news outlets?

One of my favorite quotes by one dimwitted reporter stated that, “digital signals don’t travel as far as analog signals”. The laws of physics aside, wouldn’t you think that someone at that newspaper would have caught such a ridiculous statement before it made its way to the internet, let alone to print? Unfortunately, things like math, science and just plain common sense don’t seem to have much place in today’s newsrooms.

With television, at least there is the argument that TV stations are only giving the public what it is they want. “If it bleeds, it leads”, is a popular slogan associated with local television newscasts. Ratings drive the type of coverage that TV stations give to stories. So, television viewers have no one to blame but themselves if their local TV news is saturated with sex and violence.

On the opposite end of the spectrum are most of today’s newspapers, which seem to have no interest whatsoever in giving the public what it is they want. Rather, there seems to be a type of contempt for public opinion among those that consider themselves the media elite. Their mindset seems to be that the public isn’t qualified to dictate how the news is covered and that they are somehow above answering to anyone.

While declining subscriptions to their publications should be motivating them to rethink this philosophy, it seems to have had the exact, opposite effect. Rather than conceding to public pressure to change their ways, local newspapers now seem to be on a mission to blackmail the public into submission by threatening to start charging subscriptions for what has previously been free online content. The public will just have to get used to their declining standards or face losing access to the news altogether, so far as the newspapers are concerned.

Back to the DTV conversion… It’s safe to say that you shouldn’t believe everything you read, whether it be on the internet or in print. The internet provides the public with a vast catalog of (mostly accurate) information. When in doubt, check the facts from multiple, reliable sources. When it comes to accuracy and fairness in reporting, it seems that the public needs to fend for itself more than ever these days.

To put it mildly, web sites belonging to local digital (and analog) television stations in Northern California are nearly all but useless, when it comes to finding helpful information, especially of a technical nature. With the sole exception of our local DTV PBS affiliate KEET, most local TV stations look as if they haven’t had a major website redesign in years, or have farmed-out web development to some third-party who has no interest in providing the community with any information at all.

Local NBC TV affiliate KIEM, has not made any major changes to their website in years. Last I checked, their only contact e-mail was being directed at the now-defunct local ISP Humboldt Internet. I have attempted to contact them in the past for information via e-mail, but have never received any type of reply. At first glance, it looks as if the station might be moving into the 21st century by offering streaming video of their nightly newscast. However, newscasts available on the site are usually outdated, often not adding any new material for several days at a time. To make matters worse, the station seems to be relying on some trashy third-party called VEOH to provide its streaming services. Why trashy? Just try clicking on the menu to watch any of KIEM’s previous newscasts. You’ll immediately be transported to a page that seems to specialize in streaming soft-core porn clips. As of last night, next to KIEM’s footage on VEOH are clips from the Marilyn Chambers hardcore XXX rated porn movie Behind the Green Door as well as nightly clips from The Naked News. Every single time I have viewed any of KIEM’s news broadcasts on this site, I have been bombarded with thumbnail images of pornography. The only part of KIEM’s website that seems to be updated regularly is Jim Bernard’s weather forecast. I’m guessing that Jim probably has to upload everything himself. There is also a link on the homepage to a video describing how to hook-up a DTV converter box. When you click on it, there are thumbnail previews of video clips titled “Two Girls, One Shower” and “How To Breast Feed“. Other than that, there isn’t much useful or up-to-date information to be found on the DTV switch, or anything else.

KAEF-TV, Channel 29, by contrast, offers nothing. No website. No technical information. Nothing. Their sister station KRCR in Redding has a website, but that is it. This local ABC affiliate is pretty much just a signal pumped-in from out of town, and they seem to have little to no interest in the local community or its viewers. If you want any information on DTV, HDTV or the digital television transition, you’ll need to keep looking.

This brings us to Eureka Television Group, which for some reason the Federal Communications Commission is allowing to own the majority of broadcast television stations in Humboldt County. ETG operates KVIQ (CBS), KBVU (Fox), KUVU (The CW), KEMY (MyNetwork) and KEUV (Univision). As of today, the site’s information page on the digital TV transition was last updated “Wednesday, 18 June 2008″. Yes, it’s been almost a year since they have added any new information. The rest of the site is pretty much useless. Some TV programming listings and what looks to be some syndicated, national news that is automatically added to the site via an RSS feed. No e-mail links or contact info, other than phone numbers. The “about us” page was last updated in 2006, and gives a brief bio of the station’s current owner Chester Smith. The only problem here is, Smith died in August of 2008.

The last stop on this mind-numbing journey through Humboldt County’s DTV broadcasters is local PBS affiliate KEET. Fortunately, KEET seems to be the exception to the rule among local digital TV broadcasters. Besides updated programming listings and offering wealth of information about PBS programming, you will find full contact information, along with updated news on the local DTV transition. Strangely, they even reply to e-mails! Going even further than that, KEET has actually gone out of their way to educate the public on DTV issues and seems to be the only broadcaster in the area that makes an effort to keep viewers and the local media informed as to what they are doing. Seeing as they are reliant upon public donations, one would expect them to want to keep the public tuned-in. It’s sad that they seem to be the only local broadcaster going so far out of their way to keep local residents informed though.

In closing, the Internet provides a fantasic opportunity for local television stations to keep the public informed on the DTV transition, as well as many other subjects. In most TV markets, stations take full-advantage of this fact. Updating a website is certainly much cheaper than providing airtime on their stations. Alas, KIEM is the only DTV station in the area that even bothers doing a local newscast anymore, so it appears that most local stations are not very interested in providing viewers with much more than straight “entertainment” these days.

UPDATE: As of this writing in mid-December of 2009, KIEM-TV’s website seems to be abandoned. The last newscast that was uploaded to the site was on October 12th. That was over two months ago. The contact e-mail address for the news department is now a @hotmail.com address. There are some error messages on pages due to broken scripts. I haven’t watched any of the local TV channels in months now, so I have no idea if they are even still on the air. Nothing surprises me anymore in Humboldt County.

Eureka, CA, February 24, 2009 - I was perusing KIEM-TV’s website earlier tonight when I ran across an interesting link to their policy on granting waivers to satellite television viewers (specifically DirecTV viewers) for reception of network programming at http://kiem-tv.com/waiver.html.

Basically, their policy is the same as the other local commercial television broadcasters in the area. If you need a waiver… you’re screwed. None of the local TV broadcasters will sign waivers for anyone, regardless of how bad their TV reception is.

KIEM specifically cites the FCC’s regulations about not needing to grant waivers in what are defined in Predicted Grade B Contour Areas. These are areas where anyone should supposedly be able to receive a TV signal, granted that they use an outdoor antenna placed 30′ above the ground. On it’s face, this rule actually sounds quite reasonable. Neither the FCC nor TV stations ever intended that viewers ever be able to view television programming from local broadcasters by using something as simple as a pair of “rabbit ears”, sitting on top of a television set.

Indeed, when early TV first began, there was a booming business in (outdoor) TV antenna installation. Over the years, the public has come to expect TV reception to be easy and hassle-free though. They don’t want unsightly antennas, ugly cables or silly wires cluttering their homes. This points to more of a need for a national attitude adjustment than it does a technical solution. If reception this simple is what Americans are waiting for, they are going to be sorely disappointed. It just isn’t going to happen. Not in our lifetimes, anyway. Those who want to receive a good over-the-air TV signal should be prepared to install a good antenna! It’s not politics; it’s simple physics, so get over it.

Back to the whole “Predicted Grade B Contour Area” issue though. As I stated, on it’s face, this policy seems like a logical and reasonable one. Unfortunately, the sad fact is, the technology used to create maps that show areas which fall into these contours is woefully inadequate. The standards that engineers use to create these maps has not really changed much in the past 100 years. Although computers are now used for map creation, they simply speed-up the same process that would normally take an engineer much longer to accomplish by hand.

With the exception of some very basic terrain calculations, very little real-world data is taken into consideration with these charts. Calculations are measured as if the earth existed inside a vacuum where no atmosphere, weather, earth curvature, man-made obstructions, vegetation, RF interference, multipath, solar flares or other factors ever enter into reality. To add insult to injury, these maps only show where it is allegedly technically possible to obtain “a signal”. This does NOT mean a watchable picture, or any type of signal that could reliably be used for the viewing of television pictures. It just requires that “a signal” of extremely minimal quality exists.

In fact, the FCC specifically defines the type of quality expected in a Predicted Grade B Contour Area. In one of its notices, it states: “…the values chosen for Grade B signal intensity account for location and time variability factors and predict that at least 50 percent of the locations along the Grade B contour will receive an acceptable picture 90 percent of the time. In this case, acceptable picture was considered to be TASO Level 3, defined as (passable) – The picture is of acceptable quality. Interference is not objectionable.”

Human Translation: In most areas, at best, your odds of receiving a “passable” signal by FCC standards (which most of us would probably define as a “really crappy picture”) – using an outdoor antenna placed on a 30′ mast, are 50/50… 90% of the time. Of course, these are only predictions, based upon completely inadequate data that is rarely accurate in real-world situations. Such an antenna set-up will likely set you back over $100, should probably be professionally installed and should have NO objects of ANY kind between itself and the broadcast station’s transmitting antenna. In other words, line-of-sight. Depending upon where you live, installation of a mast that extends 30′ from the top of your roof (which, for a two-story house, would be about 50′ off the ground) may also require you to obtain a building permit from your city or county, which could take months and cost hundreds if not thousands of dollars in building permits and increased property taxes. How many people can really afford that?

KIEM’s Grade B Contour Area is similar to that of other, local TV broadcasters (although, I believe that it might actually be outdated, and only show coverage areas for their older, and stronger, analog signal). Basically, if you live ANYWHERE in Humboldt, Del Norte or most of Trinity County, you are in a Grade B Contour area, according to the map. Those of us who have actually tried obtaining over-the-air TV reception in places like Trinity County will find maps such as those provided by KIEM-TV to be laughable, at best. With the new transition to DTV, the odds of obtaining a digital signal that could result in the reception of ANY type of TV picture AT ALL is diminished for the vast majority of viewers in outlying areas.

WHO’S TO BLAME FOR BAD RECEPTION?

It seems that everyone wants to point fingers in the broadcast industry. For it’s part, KIEM-TV seems to blame DirecTV for everything (strangely, they make no mention of DISH Network by name). Their position seems to be that since DirecTV promised their customers at one time that they would add local TV stations in every single U.S. market to their programming line-up, that they should be held to their word. Sounds fair enough, as DirecTV did, indeed backpedal on their promises. However, while KIEM makes it sound as if it they are blaming DirecTV out of their concern for viewers, that is almost certainly not the real reason for the finger pointing.

In reality, the main motivation behind KIEM’s attack of DirecTV is most likely due to the fact that without DirecTV footing the bill to uplink KIEM’s TV signal to their satellite, the station is not only losing potential viewers (which equals ratings, which equals money) but much more importantly, not receiving a monthly royalty check from the satellite TV provider in exchange for rebroadcast rights. KIEM gets a fat check from Suddenlink for rebroadcast rights to their subscribers each month, but not from DirecTV or DISH. Unfortunately, current FCC rules actually encourage local TV broadcasters to limit the availability of their over-the-air signals, since those receiving their programming via TV antennas pay broadcasters nothing. Those who receive their network programming via satellite, Suddenlink or other cable television companies end up having to pay broadcasters for their programming (albeit, indirectly) through increased subscription rates.

For it’s part, DirecTV aand DISH don’t seem to have anyone to blame, at least officially. DirecTV in particular, just blows-off it’s own customers by suggesting that local TV stations in Humboldt County will be included in the programming lineup “some day”. Whether they are just playing stupid, or there are employees at the company dumb enough to actually believe this, is questionable. Call a DirecTV customer service rep, and it’s quite possible that they will make local TV broadcasters out to be the bad guys, saying that their refusal to grant local waivers is unfair to TV viewers (which it certainly is). They will not acknowledge the fact that their own motivation NOT to carry these stations is due to the fact that it costs them more money to set-up and maintain the equipment alone than they could ever hope to recoup through subscription fees to the limited number of homes here.

So, who’s to REALLY blame? In my opinion, the real blame rests with the Federal Communications Commission. If it were not for the FCC’s ridiculous rules requiring local TV broadcasters to only provide a “Predicted Grade B Contour Area” (B should stand for Barely any signal at all) quality signal to local viewers without fearing competition from out-of-market TV stations carried by satellite TV providers, we simply would not be in this mess. If local TV broadcasters were held to a standard that made them provide an actual WATCHABLE TV signal in these areas, it would encourage them to provide their viewers with reliable access to programming, out of fear that they would be able to get it from elsewhere. This could be achieved through several means, most notably being the increased use of translators or requests to broadcast using increased power levels with radiation patterns that optimize reception in rural areas. Although the FCC has examined these issues in recent years, nothing positive has come out of it thus far. As it is, the transition to DTV has led to over-the-air TV signals being available to far fewer Americans than before, which is forcing more and more people to switch to cable or satellite TV just to receive programming from their local TV stations.

Just count the number of houses on your block with outdoor, over-the-air TV antennas as opposed to dishes or drops from the local cable company to confirm this fact. Even in areas that SHOULD have good local TV reception, most are forced to turn to cable or satellite for local or broadcast network programming.

ALL CABLE CUSTOMERS PAY EXTRA FEES FOR “FREE” LOCAL CHANNELS

This also applies to anyone who is able to receive local, commercial TV broadcasts on satellite services such as DirecTV or DISH Network in areas where local stations are available.

If you think that getting local channels on your cable system is free, you’re just kidding yourself. All cable TV providers such as Suddenlink have to pay commercial broadcasters to carry their signal under federal law. Of course, these added costs are going to be passed on to the consumer. You don’t think that the cable company is going to pay these extra fees out of their own pockets, do you?

The FCC states as much in their FCC Cable Television Fact Sheet. Just to make it as clear as possible, here is a direct quote from the FCC’s own literature:

Q: Will my cable bill increase as a result of retransmission consent agreements?

A: In return for allowing a cable system to carry its signal, a television station may require the payment of a fee or other consideration (for instance, carriage of another programming service or advertising time). Any new or additional costs incurred as a result of retransmission consent agreements may be passed through to cable subscribers.

The FCC needs to reconsider the current scheme in place that allows local TV stations to charge cable and satellite TV providers for rebroadcast rights to their “free” signals. After all, in theory, all that the cable and satellite broadcasters are doing is extending the reach of a TV station’s broadcast area and potential viewership, which should bring in more viewers, which should make them more money from advertisements. At least, that’s how it SHOULD work.

Unfortunately, the reality of the situation is that TV broadcasters see cable and satellite providers as alternative streams of income, and are positioning themselves to be more like pay cable channels than over-the-air broadcasters. Local TV stations used to rely upon the popularity of their programming in order to attract more viewers, which would generate better ratings, which would lead to increased profits. Under the current scheme, broadcasters don’t need ANYONE watching their programming in order to make money from cable and satellite TV providers. Rather than the public deciding through ratings what programming should stay on the air, this scheme encourages broadcasters to provide viewers with the least expensive programming they can find. Perhaps that’s why we only have a single local TV station in Humboldt County that bothers to broadcast local news (which is very expensive to produce) anymore.

The bottom line is, letting TV broadcasters charge rebroadcast fees to cable and satellite providers for their “free” signals only encourages these broadcasters to limit the quality and availability of local broadcast signals, hopefully forcing most viewers to resort to subscribing to cable or satellite, where they make much more money. This obviously runs contrary to their responsibility to serve the public interest, which they are obligated to do under federal law. This obligation results from the fact that they are using segments of the frequency spectrum, which are a limited, public resource.

Unfortunately, the FCC has all but forgotten that broadcasters are supposed to serve the public interest. Successive presidential administrations have made the Federal Communications Commission much more of a political policy tool than the enforcement and regulation entity they once used to be. Most major decisions at the agency these days are politically motivated, rather than being made on technical or legal grounds. United States courts have increasingly had to step-in in recent years to curb abuses of power at the FCC and force them to vacate their own rules, finding them to be unconstitutional. When it comes to the point where private citizens have to take federal agencies to court in order to prove that they are knowingly operating in direct violation of the United States Constitution, you really have to question their ability to act as an unbiased government regulatory agency.

WHY YOUR TV RECEPTION SUCKS… CONCLUSION

What it all boils down to is the fact that “free TV” isn’t really free for most of us anymore, especially for those caught in the middle of a pissing contest between the satellite and broadcast television industries. Unless Congress decides to step-in and force satellite TV providers like DirecTV to rebroadcast ALL local TV stations in the United States (which would result in skyrocketing satellite TV subscription prices, no pun intended), you can bet that those who live in areas with fringe reception will continue to be treated as second class citizens by both local broadcasters as well as satellite TV providers, and that the quality of television programming itself will continue to decline.

Eureka, CA, Feb 18, 2009

Apparently, broadcast networks are coming to the realization that their own investment in HDTV programming counts for very little, unless people can actually view them. To that end, FOX and NBC have set up a joint venture to make much of their HDTV programming available for free to anyone in the country via the Internet.

Assuming that you have a broadband Internet connection capable of keeping up with it and a computer monitor or display that isn’t from the stone-age, Hulu.Com may be just what you have been looking for for in HDTV programming.

Not even considering the fact that the service is absolutely free, there is a lot to like about Hulu.Com. Of particular interest to HDTV enthusiasts is the fact that a great deal of TV and movie content is available for free in 480i, which is the same HDTV broadcast format used by both the FOX and NBC TV networks for over-the-air programming. While it may not provide the same resolution as you would receive in the 1080i format used by Blu-Ray and some other broadcasters, the decreased need for bandwidth makes it much more accessible to the average broadband user.

In my own experience, trying to view streamed programming in 1080i via the Internet can be a fairly frustrating experience. Unless you have an extremely reliable connection that is capable of download streams that well exceed 3MBps, you can pretty much forget about viewing anything in 1080i. While many DSL and cable modem providers may provide speeds greater than this during occasional bursts, few are capable of delivering this much bandwidth in a sustainable fashion. The result is (a signal) that has reliability more akin to the shortwave band than one that TV viewers are used to putting up with. Unless you have fios, or other fiberoptic connection that runs directly to your home, trying to stream 1080i can be more of a headache than anything.

Back to Hulu.Com… Not all programming on this service is available in HD, but there is certainly a lot more than you will be able to receive here locally via over-the-air reception. Even their “standard” resolution is more than acceptable for most viewers, and there is much more programming available in that format.

Unlike YouTube, which mainly consists of short, low-quality amateur video “clips”, Hulu.Com is actually sanctioned by broadcasters and production companies, so nothing you will see is second-rate, insofar as quality. The most often viewed programs on the service seem to be sketch clips from Saturday Night Live. That’s followed by first-run episodes of The Daily Show with John Stewart, Family Guy, 24, Battlestar Galactica, House, Nip-Tuck and many others. The latter are all available in their entirety, unedited. In addition to the NBC and Fox networks, programming is also available from Comedy Central, G4, FX, Showtime, The Sci-Fi Channel, The USA Network and others.

Although the newest content seems to get the most attention, of particular interest to many viewers will be the site’s huge catalog of ancient TV shows and re-runs. Dozens of TV series are available, many of them from their pilot episodes until their final broadcast. Quite a number of them are from short-lived TV shows that few viewers will remember. Quite a few memorable TV shows are available as well though. Just a few include The Simpsons, ER, ALF, Married…With Children, The Bob Newhart Show, WKRP in Cincinnati, Hill Street Blues, etc.

While the selection of feature-length films isn’t anything comparable to a subscription from HBO or Showtime, you will find quite a bit of good material for free. Surprisingly, quite a number movies are available completely unedited, including a few that are Rated R. The latter requires website visitors to register (free) and login anytime they want to watch something that is “mature”.  A sampling of some of the movies recently available are Robocop, Liar, Liar, Jumanji, Virus (shot in Humboldt County!), Rocky III and The Karate Kid. Obviously, not first-run material, but not bad for free.

So, by now, you’re probably wondering… what’s the catch? There are a few, but none that are too annoying. First of all, first-run programs like The Daily Show are generally only available the day after they first air on TV. The only exception to that rule seems to be news content from NBC. Secondly, you need a really good broadband connection in order to watch anything in HDTV resolutions. Even standard resolution viewing can be a challenge if your connection and computer are not well optimized. The inability to download any material is also a bit of an annoyance, especially when the stream you are watching gets interrupted by some sort of Internet glitch. While the service does provide a small memory “buffer”, it is not possible to control it in any way, and can make viewing a hit-or-miss proposition when bandwidth demands are strained. Commercials. Did I mention that almost all of the programming has commercials? Compared to broadcast TV or cable, the commercials are hardly noticeable though. Commercial interruptions are 30 seconds AT MOST, and take place infrequently. There is also an annoying JavaScript login that will NOT store your name and password from one TV show to the next. It only pops-up if you are watching R Rated content though.

Other than that, the service is remarkably catch-free. One of my biggest kudos for the service is the fact that it does not require any type of special software or operating system. I do almost all of my work on a laptop running Ubuntu Linux without any problems. Obviously, it runs on computers running Windows as well. It should also work on recent versions of the Mac.

While services like Hulu.Com will almost certainly never replace cable or satellite television, it definitely is a welcomed addition to one’s programming choices, especially for those of us who do not have access to local TV programming in HDTV. While the service may not be perfect, it certainly is worth far more than you will ever pay for it.

The bill still needs to be approved by the U.S. Congress before it is signed into law by President Obama. Both the President and Congress have indicated their willingness to see the law passed. The original deadline for the transition to digital television was February 17th.

“Delaying the upcoming DTV switch is the right thing to do,” said Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., author of the bill to push back the deadline. “I firmly believe that our nation is not yet ready to make this transition at this time.”

It is presumed (details on the bill are not public yet) that the bill also allocates an additional $25 million in funding to The National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which is the government agency responsible for dispersing $40 discount coupons for set top CECB converter boxes. The converter boxes allow those with analog television sets to decode the DTV or HDTV signals for viewing, albeit with degraded picture and sound quality. To get on the waiting list for coupons, U.S. residents may call 1-888-DTV-2009 or visit the TV Converter Box Coupon Program at http://www.dtv2009.gov.

Up until today, the looming DTV transition deadline in February and the current shortage of coupons sent by the government had created a miniature black market for the items. Ads on Craigslist.Org and auctions on eBay had been demanding higher and higher prices. This should put a quick end to most of these ads, which were being quickly deleted by each of the two websites. It is currently against federal law for anyone to sell DTV converter coupons.

That being said, there is an excellent story written by a reporter for the Associated Press (AP) that is making the rounds in syndication this morning. It offers some great perspective as to why it is such a bad idea to push back the February 2009 switchover date to digital television (DTV).

One factor that the mainstream media has never brought-up before is just how much it is costing TV broadcasters to simulcast both digital and analog signals prior to the switchover date. According to the article, one ABC-TV affiliate spends in excess of $20,000 a month on electricity alone for the old analog transmitter, on top of what they are spending on electricity for their new HDTV transmitter. So, pushing the DTV switchover date back for four months could cost TV stations upwards of $80,000. That may be a drop in the bucket for TV stations in larger markets, but in markets like Humboldt County where margins for broadcasters are already razor thin, that kind of money is no trivial matter.

Another fascinating statistic… the waiting list for $40 digital television converter (CECB) coupons has swollen to 2.6 million people. At this rate, even the additional $25 million that the government is planning on putting into the coupon program may not be enough to satisfy consumer demand. So, if you aren’t yet on the waiting list and still need a DTV converter box coupon, you should get on the list right-away, because there likely will not be enough to go around for everyone.

You can read the original AP article HERE.

After penning a request to Congress two weeks ago to push back the official transition date to digital television, it seems that both the House and U.S. Senate are prepared to do just that. The below paragraph from Friday’s Washington Post pretty much sums it up:

“Key senators have reached a compromise on a bill that would delay the nation’s switch to all-digital television from next month until June 12. A vote on the legislation is expected early next week.”

As if that weren’t enough, there is also talk that an additional $250 Million may be on its way to help bail out the government’s $40 coupon program, which helps consumers to pay for CECB digital television converter boxes. Assuming that each person gets two $40 coupons, the $250 million might cover the cost of providing DTV converter boxes to the current backlog of coupon requests, which last numbered well over 1 million.

Of course, the companies that manufacture these DTV converter boxes will most likely be caught off-guard by these new developments, and there is just no telling whether or not they will resume production to the level where everyone will be able to find one before June.

So, it seems that next month’s deadline may be more than a bit anticlimactic. Of course, broadcasters still have the right to switch everything over to digital television and eliminate their analog signals at any time. The bill would only push back the date at which switching to DTV would be mandatory for TV stations. I expect that quite a few broadcasters will actually opt to stick with the February deadline, since it has been in the works for so long.

Apparently, the Federal Communications Commission received a number of complaints about the cable television provider when it decided to switch certain analog channels on its cable system to digital this past month. The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau launched an investigation into the matter and ordered Suddenlink to answer a number of questions and provide documentation on the matter via an official Letter of Inquiry (LOI). It gave Suddenlink two weeks to respond.

Rather than comply with the LOI, or even attempt to comply, some bonehead acting on behalf of the company decided to send back a letter questioning the FCC’s authority on the matter and actually accused the Commission of breaking federal law by not complying with the federal “Paperwork Reduction Act”, among other things. They also questioned the FCC’s authority to demand such information within two weeks, which they deemed not enough time. They never suggested exactly how much time they thought would be more appropriate. Three weeks, perhaps?

Anyone who has ever dealt with the Federal Communications Commission is well-aware that anyone falling under their authority (Suddenlink definitely does) who is stupid enough to question their judgment or jurisdiction is just asking for trouble. To put it mildly, the FCC has no sense of humor when it comes to these matters. The fact that someone this incompetent at Suddenlink has been put in a position responsible enough to respond to official inquiries from the U.S. Government simply boggles my mind. I am used to seeing these kinds of responses from dimwitted CEO’s of telecommunications resellers, but to see this coming from a licensed, facilities-based carrier is just plain scary. If the company was publicly-traded, I would advise dumping their stock immediately, as corporate incompetence such as this rarely results in a solid bottom line. As it is, I’m just lucky that I don’t have to suffer through being a Suddenlink customer.

In any event, the results were completely predictable. Suddenlink was issued an NAL, or Notice of Apparent Liability, for $25,000 for its part in thwarting the FCC’s investigation. An NAL is sort of like a speeding ticket. The company has the right to a hearing, but it’s pretty much just a kangaroo court that is run by the same people who ordered the NAL in the first place. You can’t fight city hall. Duh!

This may not be the end of the matter, by a long stretch. If Suddenlink continues to stonewall the FCC, the Commission will simply keep piling-on the fines. In theory, they could actually revoke Suddenlink’s ability to offer its services. I have to believe that there must be someone with an ounce of sanity at the company who will step-in before it comes to that though. Until then, Suddenlink customers will likely look forward to higher cable bills as a result of the NAL. After all, someone has to pay for the $25,000 penalty, and it quite certainly isn’t going to come out of the pockets of Suddenlink executives.

A copy of the NAL in Adobe Acrobat format is attached for your reading pleasure.

http://www.fcc.gov/suddenlink.pdf

“ President-elect Barack Obama is urging Congress to postpone the Feb. 17 switch from analog to digital television broadcasting, arguing that too many Americans who rely on analog TV sets to pick up over-the-air channels won’t be ready.”

You can read the rest of the article here:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,478005,00.html

On another note, it seems that the federal government has run out of money for DTV converter coupons. As of earlier this month, anyone calling 1-800-DTV-2009
or trying to obtain one via the web at http://www.dtv2009.gov will only be put on a waiting list to receive their coupons. The waiting list is only possible due to the expiration of unused coupons that have already been issued. At the moment, over 1 million people are already on the waiting list. Since the current coupons expire in 90 days, the waiting list scenario can only last for another 3 months or so, unless Congress decides to provide additional funding for more coupons.

Unless Congress decides to delay the February 17, 2009 transition date (unlikely), the odds are that over a million people will not receive coupons by the time that the switch to DTV takes place. Leave it to the federal government to screw-up yet another massive project. Perhaps, our tax dollars would be wiser spent outsourcing jobs like this to private industry in the future?

In any event, short of an act of Congress, next month’s mandatory switch to digital television (DTV) will likely go on as scheduled.

As most of us know by now, there are no more coupons left. At this point, all one can do is get on a waiting list with more than 1 million people ahead of you. Unless Congress decides to provide additional funding (not likely), most people on the waiting list will be waiting forever. I think it’s safe to say at this point that anyone needing a DTV converter box is on their own. Unless you already have an un-expired coupon already, you are most likely out of luck.

The good news is, as the current supply of non digital televisions slowly work their way to the junk piles to be replaced by HDTV ready TV sets, you will eventually see the existing converter boxes make their way to yard sales, flea markets and (of course) eBay. Being the transitional technology it is, DTV converter boxes will eventually end-up becoming an obsolete piece of equipment that almost no one will need to own. So, if you don’t mind waiting awhile, you will eventually be able to buy these things for next to nothing.

For those of you who would like some “face time” with a representative of the FCC, there will be a digital conversion workshop at the offices of the Area 1 Agency on Aging in Eureka, CA, on Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 11 a.m. The A1AA is located at 434 Seventh Street.

The bottom line is, TV stations like KIEM-TV probably can’t justify the cost of spending tens of thousands of dollars to upgrade small translators like those in Orleans, which reach only a handful of viewers. While the FCC pedals its “No TV left behind” rhetoric to the public, the economics of the situation does not bode well for either broadcasters or rural TV viewers. While financial aid has been made available to the public via TV converter coupons, TV stations in small markets and those serving rural communities via translators are getting no such help from the federal government.

In light of recent events with the economy, the federal government’s mandate that TV stations cease broadcasting their analog signals in February is dripping with irony. On one hand you have the federal government handing over hundreds of billions of dollars to banks and automakers with few or no strings attached so that they may continue selling Americans overpriced cars and high-interest loans. On the other hand, we have the Federal Communications Commission forcing for-profit businesses to cease offering a free service to the public that actually pays for itself. Here’s the real punchline though… part of the motivation for forcing broadcasters to cease transmitting analog signals in the VHF band is so that the government can turn around and auction off those same frequencies for billions of dollars. Much of that money may end up being spent on bailing out banks and automakers.

Obviously, the FCC could not have foreseen the current economic crisis and the resulting overwhelming lack of enthusiasm that consumers are currently showing when it comes to paying for upgrades to their TV sets. The unfolding scandals plaguing the FCC are only likely to grow worse when thousands of Americans eventually lose access to television programming in February though.

I ended-up unplugging the power cord of the receiver for a few seconds, then plugged it back in again. It worked, although it took the receiver a good 10+ minutes to cycle through a half-dozen or so status messages while it was “booting up”. The HD DVR actually took longer to boot than Windows 95! I had thought this to be an isolated incident, but it turns out that I wasn’t alone.

Below is an excerpt from an e-mail that I just received from DirecTV this afternoon. It seems that quite a few people must have experienced the same “glitch” that I did. DirecTV’s “official” method for getting your HDTV DVR and receiver un-stuck is to press the reset button. That should work just as well as the “unplug it, then plug it back in” method that I used. Fortunately, I didn’t lose any programming that was set to record on the HD DVR. Those of you who haven’t turned on your HDTV sets today may want to do so though, just to make sure that your DirecTV DVR or satellite receiver hasn’t turned into a zombie like mine did.

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT YOUR HD DVR OR DVR RECEIVER

In our effort to improve and expand our service, we experienced a temporary technical glitch. If your HD DVR or DVR receiver is not responding to your remote control or front panel commands, you can resolve this issue by pressing the red “Reset” button located inside the small door on the front right corner of your receiver. Please allow about 15 minutes for your receiver to complete the resetting process. Once completed, your picture will return automatically. Unfortunately, any show you may have scheduled to record yesterday will not be available on your DVR.

We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Our promise is to provide you with the best television experience, and to resolve any issues that might arise as quickly as possible. If you have any further concerns, please do not hesitate in contacting us at 1-800-347-3288.

This new digital tower will serve Brookings-Harbor, Ore., and Crescent City.

The Eureka-based PBS station is installing a 12,000-watt ultra-high-frequency digital translator, which will duplicate programs broadcast on KEET-TV’s current Eureka digital signal.

As part of the project, KEET is constructing a 132-foot tower to hold the antennas, which should be completed by late August.

The translator, which will actually receive and then transmit KEET-TV’s signal in Del Norte and Curry counties, should be in operation by October.

To read the entire article from The Eureka Reporter: Click here

“He’s basically a living legend,” said Don Smullin, general manager of Eureka Television Group. Smith was the owner of a media empire that spanned from Bakersfield to Oregon and that included the local Fox, Univision, CW, My Network and CBS stations.

While Smullin said he didn’t yet know who would take over as owner of Eureka’s five stations, he assumed it would be someone in Smith’s family, but added, “I’m not privy to that information.” Until a replacement is named, Smullin said he has no worries for the television group’s future. “A lot of the blessings we have is that Chester left the company in very strong financial shape,” he said. “We have no debt.”