I’ve most likely read over 100 articles that have been written about the conversion to digital television over the past two weeks. These stories have ranged from a couple of sentences in a small-town newspaper to a feature story in the New York Times. They are all remarkably similar in nature, unfortunately. Poorly researched, uninformative and in some cases little more than a flimsy literary excuse for writing copy that pushes their own, personal political agendas. There seems to be very little that is professional about professional journalism these days. Is it any wonder that more and more Americans are turning to such outlets as blogs, Twitter and even entertainment shows for their “news fix” and are increasingly turning their backs on traditional news outlets?

One of my favorite quotes by one dimwitted reporter stated that, “digital signals don’t travel as far as analog signals”. The laws of physics aside, wouldn’t you think that someone at that newspaper would have caught such a ridiculous statement before it made its way to the internet, let alone to print? Unfortunately, things like math, science and just plain common sense don’t seem to have much place in today’s newsrooms.

With television, at least there is the argument that TV stations are only giving the public what it is they want. “If it bleeds, it leads”, is a popular slogan associated with local television newscasts. Ratings drive the type of coverage that TV stations give to stories. So, television viewers have no one to blame but themselves if their local TV news is saturated with sex and violence.

On the opposite end of the spectrum are most of today’s newspapers, which seem to have no interest whatsoever in giving the public what it is they want. Rather, there seems to be a type of contempt for public opinion among those that consider themselves the media elite. Their mindset seems to be that the public isn’t qualified to dictate how the news is covered and that they are somehow above answering to anyone.

While declining subscriptions to their publications should be motivating them to rethink this philosophy, it seems to have had the exact, opposite effect. Rather than conceding to public pressure to change their ways, local newspapers now seem to be on a mission to blackmail the public into submission by threatening to start charging subscriptions for what has previously been free online content. The public will just have to get used to their declining standards or face losing access to the news altogether, so far as the newspapers are concerned.

Back to the DTV conversion… It’s safe to say that you shouldn’t believe everything you read, whether it be on the internet or in print. The internet provides the public with a vast catalog of (mostly accurate) information. When in doubt, check the facts from multiple, reliable sources. When it comes to accuracy and fairness in reporting, it seems that the public needs to fend for itself more than ever these days.

Eureka, CA, February 24, 2009 - I was perusing KIEM-TV’s website earlier tonight when I ran across an interesting link to their policy on granting waivers to satellite television viewers (specifically DirecTV viewers) for reception of network programming at http://kiem-tv.com/waiver.html.

Basically, their policy is the same as the other local commercial television broadcasters in the area. If you need a waiver… you’re screwed. None of the local TV broadcasters will sign waivers for anyone, regardless of how bad their TV reception is.

KIEM specifically cites the FCC’s regulations about not needing to grant waivers in what are defined in Predicted Grade B Contour Areas. These are areas where anyone should supposedly be able to receive a TV signal, granted that they use an outdoor antenna placed 30′ above the ground. On it’s face, this rule actually sounds quite reasonable. Neither the FCC nor TV stations ever intended that viewers ever be able to view television programming from local broadcasters by using something as simple as a pair of “rabbit ears”, sitting on top of a television set.

Indeed, when early TV first began, there was a booming business in (outdoor) TV antenna installation. Over the years, the public has come to expect TV reception to be easy and hassle-free though. They don’t want unsightly antennas, ugly cables or silly wires cluttering their homes. This points to more of a need for a national attitude adjustment than it does a technical solution. If reception this simple is what Americans are waiting for, they are going to be sorely disappointed. It just isn’t going to happen. Not in our lifetimes, anyway. Those who want to receive a good over-the-air TV signal should be prepared to install a good antenna! It’s not politics; it’s simple physics, so get over it.

Back to the whole “Predicted Grade B Contour Area” issue though. As I stated, on it’s face, this policy seems like a logical and reasonable one. Unfortunately, the sad fact is, the technology used to create maps that show areas which fall into these contours is woefully inadequate. The standards that engineers use to create these maps has not really changed much in the past 100 years. Although computers are now used for map creation, they simply speed-up the same process that would normally take an engineer much longer to accomplish by hand.

With the exception of some very basic terrain calculations, very little real-world data is taken into consideration with these charts. Calculations are measured as if the earth existed inside a vacuum where no atmosphere, weather, earth curvature, man-made obstructions, vegetation, RF interference, multipath, solar flares or other factors ever enter into reality. To add insult to injury, these maps only show where it is allegedly technically possible to obtain “a signal”. This does NOT mean a watchable picture, or any type of signal that could reliably be used for the viewing of television pictures. It just requires that “a signal” of extremely minimal quality exists.

In fact, the FCC specifically defines the type of quality expected in a Predicted Grade B Contour Area. In one of its notices, it states: “…the values chosen for Grade B signal intensity account for location and time variability factors and predict that at least 50 percent of the locations along the Grade B contour will receive an acceptable picture 90 percent of the time. In this case, acceptable picture was considered to be TASO Level 3, defined as (passable) – The picture is of acceptable quality. Interference is not objectionable.”

Human Translation: In most areas, at best, your odds of receiving a “passable” signal by FCC standards (which most of us would probably define as a “really crappy picture”) – using an outdoor antenna placed on a 30′ mast, are 50/50… 90% of the time. Of course, these are only predictions, based upon completely inadequate data that is rarely accurate in real-world situations. Such an antenna set-up will likely set you back over $100, should probably be professionally installed and should have NO objects of ANY kind between itself and the broadcast station’s transmitting antenna. In other words, line-of-sight. Depending upon where you live, installation of a mast that extends 30′ from the top of your roof (which, for a two-story house, would be about 50′ off the ground) may also require you to obtain a building permit from your city or county, which could take months and cost hundreds if not thousands of dollars in building permits and increased property taxes. How many people can really afford that?

KIEM’s Grade B Contour Area is similar to that of other, local TV broadcasters (although, I believe that it might actually be outdated, and only show coverage areas for their older, and stronger, analog signal). Basically, if you live ANYWHERE in Humboldt, Del Norte or most of Trinity County, you are in a Grade B Contour area, according to the map. Those of us who have actually tried obtaining over-the-air TV reception in places like Trinity County will find maps such as those provided by KIEM-TV to be laughable, at best. With the new transition to DTV, the odds of obtaining a digital signal that could result in the reception of ANY type of TV picture AT ALL is diminished for the vast majority of viewers in outlying areas.

WHO’S TO BLAME FOR BAD RECEPTION?

It seems that everyone wants to point fingers in the broadcast industry. For it’s part, KIEM-TV seems to blame DirecTV for everything (strangely, they make no mention of DISH Network by name). Their position seems to be that since DirecTV promised their customers at one time that they would add local TV stations in every single U.S. market to their programming line-up, that they should be held to their word. Sounds fair enough, as DirecTV did, indeed backpedal on their promises. However, while KIEM makes it sound as if it they are blaming DirecTV out of their concern for viewers, that is almost certainly not the real reason for the finger pointing.

In reality, the main motivation behind KIEM’s attack of DirecTV is most likely due to the fact that without DirecTV footing the bill to uplink KIEM’s TV signal to their satellite, the station is not only losing potential viewers (which equals ratings, which equals money) but much more importantly, not receiving a monthly royalty check from the satellite TV provider in exchange for rebroadcast rights. KIEM gets a fat check from Suddenlink for rebroadcast rights to their subscribers each month, but not from DirecTV or DISH. Unfortunately, current FCC rules actually encourage local TV broadcasters to limit the availability of their over-the-air signals, since those receiving their programming via TV antennas pay broadcasters nothing. Those who receive their network programming via satellite, Suddenlink or other cable television companies end up having to pay broadcasters for their programming (albeit, indirectly) through increased subscription rates.

For it’s part, DirecTV aand DISH don’t seem to have anyone to blame, at least officially. DirecTV in particular, just blows-off it’s own customers by suggesting that local TV stations in Humboldt County will be included in the programming lineup “some day”. Whether they are just playing stupid, or there are employees at the company dumb enough to actually believe this, is questionable. Call a DirecTV customer service rep, and it’s quite possible that they will make local TV broadcasters out to be the bad guys, saying that their refusal to grant local waivers is unfair to TV viewers (which it certainly is). They will not acknowledge the fact that their own motivation NOT to carry these stations is due to the fact that it costs them more money to set-up and maintain the equipment alone than they could ever hope to recoup through subscription fees to the limited number of homes here.

So, who’s to REALLY blame? In my opinion, the real blame rests with the Federal Communications Commission. If it were not for the FCC’s ridiculous rules requiring local TV broadcasters to only provide a “Predicted Grade B Contour Area” (B should stand for Barely any signal at all) quality signal to local viewers without fearing competition from out-of-market TV stations carried by satellite TV providers, we simply would not be in this mess. If local TV broadcasters were held to a standard that made them provide an actual WATCHABLE TV signal in these areas, it would encourage them to provide their viewers with reliable access to programming, out of fear that they would be able to get it from elsewhere. This could be achieved through several means, most notably being the increased use of translators or requests to broadcast using increased power levels with radiation patterns that optimize reception in rural areas. Although the FCC has examined these issues in recent years, nothing positive has come out of it thus far. As it is, the transition to DTV has led to over-the-air TV signals being available to far fewer Americans than before, which is forcing more and more people to switch to cable or satellite TV just to receive programming from their local TV stations.

Just count the number of houses on your block with outdoor, over-the-air TV antennas as opposed to dishes or drops from the local cable company to confirm this fact. Even in areas that SHOULD have good local TV reception, most are forced to turn to cable or satellite for local or broadcast network programming.

ALL CABLE CUSTOMERS PAY EXTRA FEES FOR “FREE” LOCAL CHANNELS

This also applies to anyone who is able to receive local, commercial TV broadcasts on satellite services such as DirecTV or DISH Network in areas where local stations are available.

If you think that getting local channels on your cable system is free, you’re just kidding yourself. All cable TV providers such as Suddenlink have to pay commercial broadcasters to carry their signal under federal law. Of course, these added costs are going to be passed on to the consumer. You don’t think that the cable company is going to pay these extra fees out of their own pockets, do you?

The FCC states as much in their FCC Cable Television Fact Sheet. Just to make it as clear as possible, here is a direct quote from the FCC’s own literature:

Q: Will my cable bill increase as a result of retransmission consent agreements?

A: In return for allowing a cable system to carry its signal, a television station may require the payment of a fee or other consideration (for instance, carriage of another programming service or advertising time). Any new or additional costs incurred as a result of retransmission consent agreements may be passed through to cable subscribers.

The FCC needs to reconsider the current scheme in place that allows local TV stations to charge cable and satellite TV providers for rebroadcast rights to their “free” signals. After all, in theory, all that the cable and satellite broadcasters are doing is extending the reach of a TV station’s broadcast area and potential viewership, which should bring in more viewers, which should make them more money from advertisements. At least, that’s how it SHOULD work.

Unfortunately, the reality of the situation is that TV broadcasters see cable and satellite providers as alternative streams of income, and are positioning themselves to be more like pay cable channels than over-the-air broadcasters. Local TV stations used to rely upon the popularity of their programming in order to attract more viewers, which would generate better ratings, which would lead to increased profits. Under the current scheme, broadcasters don’t need ANYONE watching their programming in order to make money from cable and satellite TV providers. Rather than the public deciding through ratings what programming should stay on the air, this scheme encourages broadcasters to provide viewers with the least expensive programming they can find. Perhaps that’s why we only have a single local TV station in Humboldt County that bothers to broadcast local news (which is very expensive to produce) anymore.

The bottom line is, letting TV broadcasters charge rebroadcast fees to cable and satellite providers for their “free” signals only encourages these broadcasters to limit the quality and availability of local broadcast signals, hopefully forcing most viewers to resort to subscribing to cable or satellite, where they make much more money. This obviously runs contrary to their responsibility to serve the public interest, which they are obligated to do under federal law. This obligation results from the fact that they are using segments of the frequency spectrum, which are a limited, public resource.

Unfortunately, the FCC has all but forgotten that broadcasters are supposed to serve the public interest. Successive presidential administrations have made the Federal Communications Commission much more of a political policy tool than the enforcement and regulation entity they once used to be. Most major decisions at the agency these days are politically motivated, rather than being made on technical or legal grounds. United States courts have increasingly had to step-in in recent years to curb abuses of power at the FCC and force them to vacate their own rules, finding them to be unconstitutional. When it comes to the point where private citizens have to take federal agencies to court in order to prove that they are knowingly operating in direct violation of the United States Constitution, you really have to question their ability to act as an unbiased government regulatory agency.

WHY YOUR TV RECEPTION SUCKS… CONCLUSION

What it all boils down to is the fact that “free TV” isn’t really free for most of us anymore, especially for those caught in the middle of a pissing contest between the satellite and broadcast television industries. Unless Congress decides to step-in and force satellite TV providers like DirecTV to rebroadcast ALL local TV stations in the United States (which would result in skyrocketing satellite TV subscription prices, no pun intended), you can bet that those who live in areas with fringe reception will continue to be treated as second class citizens by both local broadcasters as well as satellite TV providers, and that the quality of television programming itself will continue to decline.

The bill still needs to be approved by the U.S. Congress before it is signed into law by President Obama. Both the President and Congress have indicated their willingness to see the law passed. The original deadline for the transition to digital television was February 17th.

“Delaying the upcoming DTV switch is the right thing to do,” said Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., author of the bill to push back the deadline. “I firmly believe that our nation is not yet ready to make this transition at this time.”

It is presumed (details on the bill are not public yet) that the bill also allocates an additional $25 million in funding to The National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which is the government agency responsible for dispersing $40 discount coupons for set top CECB converter boxes. The converter boxes allow those with analog television sets to decode the DTV or HDTV signals for viewing, albeit with degraded picture and sound quality. To get on the waiting list for coupons, U.S. residents may call 1-888-DTV-2009 or visit the TV Converter Box Coupon Program at http://www.dtv2009.gov.

Up until today, the looming DTV transition deadline in February and the current shortage of coupons sent by the government had created a miniature black market for the items. Ads on Craigslist.Org and auctions on eBay had been demanding higher and higher prices. This should put a quick end to most of these ads, which were being quickly deleted by each of the two websites. It is currently against federal law for anyone to sell DTV converter coupons.

That being said, there is an excellent story written by a reporter for the Associated Press (AP) that is making the rounds in syndication this morning. It offers some great perspective as to why it is such a bad idea to push back the February 2009 switchover date to digital television (DTV).

One factor that the mainstream media has never brought-up before is just how much it is costing TV broadcasters to simulcast both digital and analog signals prior to the switchover date. According to the article, one ABC-TV affiliate spends in excess of $20,000 a month on electricity alone for the old analog transmitter, on top of what they are spending on electricity for their new HDTV transmitter. So, pushing the DTV switchover date back for four months could cost TV stations upwards of $80,000. That may be a drop in the bucket for TV stations in larger markets, but in markets like Humboldt County where margins for broadcasters are already razor thin, that kind of money is no trivial matter.

Another fascinating statistic… the waiting list for $40 digital television converter (CECB) coupons has swollen to 2.6 million people. At this rate, even the additional $25 million that the government is planning on putting into the coupon program may not be enough to satisfy consumer demand. So, if you aren’t yet on the waiting list and still need a DTV converter box coupon, you should get on the list right-away, because there likely will not be enough to go around for everyone.

You can read the original AP article HERE.

After penning a request to Congress two weeks ago to push back the official transition date to digital television, it seems that both the House and U.S. Senate are prepared to do just that. The below paragraph from Friday’s Washington Post pretty much sums it up:

“Key senators have reached a compromise on a bill that would delay the nation’s switch to all-digital television from next month until June 12. A vote on the legislation is expected early next week.”

As if that weren’t enough, there is also talk that an additional $250 Million may be on its way to help bail out the government’s $40 coupon program, which helps consumers to pay for CECB digital television converter boxes. Assuming that each person gets two $40 coupons, the $250 million might cover the cost of providing DTV converter boxes to the current backlog of coupon requests, which last numbered well over 1 million.

Of course, the companies that manufacture these DTV converter boxes will most likely be caught off-guard by these new developments, and there is just no telling whether or not they will resume production to the level where everyone will be able to find one before June.

So, it seems that next month’s deadline may be more than a bit anticlimactic. Of course, broadcasters still have the right to switch everything over to digital television and eliminate their analog signals at any time. The bill would only push back the date at which switching to DTV would be mandatory for TV stations. I expect that quite a few broadcasters will actually opt to stick with the February deadline, since it has been in the works for so long.

Apparently, the Federal Communications Commission received a number of complaints about the cable television provider when it decided to switch certain analog channels on its cable system to digital this past month. The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau launched an investigation into the matter and ordered Suddenlink to answer a number of questions and provide documentation on the matter via an official Letter of Inquiry (LOI). It gave Suddenlink two weeks to respond.

Rather than comply with the LOI, or even attempt to comply, some bonehead acting on behalf of the company decided to send back a letter questioning the FCC’s authority on the matter and actually accused the Commission of breaking federal law by not complying with the federal “Paperwork Reduction Act”, among other things. They also questioned the FCC’s authority to demand such information within two weeks, which they deemed not enough time. They never suggested exactly how much time they thought would be more appropriate. Three weeks, perhaps?

Anyone who has ever dealt with the Federal Communications Commission is well-aware that anyone falling under their authority (Suddenlink definitely does) who is stupid enough to question their judgment or jurisdiction is just asking for trouble. To put it mildly, the FCC has no sense of humor when it comes to these matters. The fact that someone this incompetent at Suddenlink has been put in a position responsible enough to respond to official inquiries from the U.S. Government simply boggles my mind. I am used to seeing these kinds of responses from dimwitted CEO’s of telecommunications resellers, but to see this coming from a licensed, facilities-based carrier is just plain scary. If the company was publicly-traded, I would advise dumping their stock immediately, as corporate incompetence such as this rarely results in a solid bottom line. As it is, I’m just lucky that I don’t have to suffer through being a Suddenlink customer.

In any event, the results were completely predictable. Suddenlink was issued an NAL, or Notice of Apparent Liability, for $25,000 for its part in thwarting the FCC’s investigation. An NAL is sort of like a speeding ticket. The company has the right to a hearing, but it’s pretty much just a kangaroo court that is run by the same people who ordered the NAL in the first place. You can’t fight city hall. Duh!

This may not be the end of the matter, by a long stretch. If Suddenlink continues to stonewall the FCC, the Commission will simply keep piling-on the fines. In theory, they could actually revoke Suddenlink’s ability to offer its services. I have to believe that there must be someone with an ounce of sanity at the company who will step-in before it comes to that though. Until then, Suddenlink customers will likely look forward to higher cable bills as a result of the NAL. After all, someone has to pay for the $25,000 penalty, and it quite certainly isn’t going to come out of the pockets of Suddenlink executives.

A copy of the NAL in Adobe Acrobat format is attached for your reading pleasure.

http://www.fcc.gov/suddenlink.pdf

“ President-elect Barack Obama is urging Congress to postpone the Feb. 17 switch from analog to digital television broadcasting, arguing that too many Americans who rely on analog TV sets to pick up over-the-air channels won’t be ready.”

You can read the rest of the article here:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,478005,00.html

On another note, it seems that the federal government has run out of money for DTV converter coupons. As of earlier this month, anyone calling 1-800-DTV-2009
or trying to obtain one via the web at http://www.dtv2009.gov will only be put on a waiting list to receive their coupons. The waiting list is only possible due to the expiration of unused coupons that have already been issued. At the moment, over 1 million people are already on the waiting list. Since the current coupons expire in 90 days, the waiting list scenario can only last for another 3 months or so, unless Congress decides to provide additional funding for more coupons.

Unless Congress decides to delay the February 17, 2009 transition date (unlikely), the odds are that over a million people will not receive coupons by the time that the switch to DTV takes place. Leave it to the federal government to screw-up yet another massive project. Perhaps, our tax dollars would be wiser spent outsourcing jobs like this to private industry in the future?

In any event, short of an act of Congress, next month’s mandatory switch to digital television (DTV) will likely go on as scheduled.

As most of us know by now, there are no more coupons left. At this point, all one can do is get on a waiting list with more than 1 million people ahead of you. Unless Congress decides to provide additional funding (not likely), most people on the waiting list will be waiting forever. I think it’s safe to say at this point that anyone needing a DTV converter box is on their own. Unless you already have an un-expired coupon already, you are most likely out of luck.

The good news is, as the current supply of non digital televisions slowly work their way to the junk piles to be replaced by HDTV ready TV sets, you will eventually see the existing converter boxes make their way to yard sales, flea markets and (of course) eBay. Being the transitional technology it is, DTV converter boxes will eventually end-up becoming an obsolete piece of equipment that almost no one will need to own. So, if you don’t mind waiting awhile, you will eventually be able to buy these things for next to nothing.

For those of you who would like some “face time” with a representative of the FCC, there will be a digital conversion workshop at the offices of the Area 1 Agency on Aging in Eureka, CA, on Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 11 a.m. The A1AA is located at 434 Seventh Street.

The bottom line is, TV stations like KIEM-TV probably can’t justify the cost of spending tens of thousands of dollars to upgrade small translators like those in Orleans, which reach only a handful of viewers. While the FCC pedals its “No TV left behind” rhetoric to the public, the economics of the situation does not bode well for either broadcasters or rural TV viewers. While financial aid has been made available to the public via TV converter coupons, TV stations in small markets and those serving rural communities via translators are getting no such help from the federal government.

In light of recent events with the economy, the federal government’s mandate that TV stations cease broadcasting their analog signals in February is dripping with irony. On one hand you have the federal government handing over hundreds of billions of dollars to banks and automakers with few or no strings attached so that they may continue selling Americans overpriced cars and high-interest loans. On the other hand, we have the Federal Communications Commission forcing for-profit businesses to cease offering a free service to the public that actually pays for itself. Here’s the real punchline though… part of the motivation for forcing broadcasters to cease transmitting analog signals in the VHF band is so that the government can turn around and auction off those same frequencies for billions of dollars. Much of that money may end up being spent on bailing out banks and automakers.

Obviously, the FCC could not have foreseen the current economic crisis and the resulting overwhelming lack of enthusiasm that consumers are currently showing when it comes to paying for upgrades to their TV sets. The unfolding scandals plaguing the FCC are only likely to grow worse when thousands of Americans eventually lose access to television programming in February though.

This new digital tower will serve Brookings-Harbor, Ore., and Crescent City.

The Eureka-based PBS station is installing a 12,000-watt ultra-high-frequency digital translator, which will duplicate programs broadcast on KEET-TV’s current Eureka digital signal.

As part of the project, KEET is constructing a 132-foot tower to hold the antennas, which should be completed by late August.

The translator, which will actually receive and then transmit KEET-TV’s signal in Del Norte and Curry counties, should be in operation by October.

To read the entire article from The Eureka Reporter: Click here

We have been looking for a source of these DTV converter boxes locally for awhile now. The hard part wasn’t so much finding a store that stocked the boxes, but finding a model that included the analog pass-through feature that didn’t cost an arm and a leg. Without this feature, we would lose access to about half of the channels that will be available locally after February 2009. This includes all local LPTV (Low Power Television) stations and translators. We’ve written plenty of articles on this feature in the past, so be sure to check our archives for more information.

So, what did we find, and where did we find it? Surprisingly, the store that finally came through for us was Target. The Target store in Eureka, California stocks three different models of DTV converter boxes. The first two are pretty much a waste of money, since they do not have analog pass-through. They always seem to have plenty of these boxes in stock, strangely enough. However, after making repeated trips to the store last week we finally found the model in stock that we wanted. It’s the Venturer STB7766G1.

Obviously, Venturer is not exactly a household name, but we have not seen a great deal of difference in quality between manufacturers when it comes to DTV converter boxes, so we’re not too worried as to the quality. The main thing we are interested in here are the features and the price, which is the lowest we have seen any DTV converter box sell for.

Assuming that you happen to arrive at a time when these boxes are in stock, the sticker price is $49.95. Of course, that’s the price before applying the discount from your $40 government coupon. Once you toss-in the sales tax of 7.25% (that’s what it is here), your final purchase price will be a little over $13. Of course, the state sales tax is calculated on the original sticker price of $49.95.

Be sure to have your government coupon handy with you when you go to the store, and be sure to pay attention to the total price when checking out. As we could have guessed, the Target employee at the check-out counter was totally clueless as to how to apply the coupon, and originally charged us full-price for the unit, even after having scanned the coupon! So, make sure that they actually apply the $40 discount while you are there, unless you plan on making a return trip to get your money back for being overcharged.

Interestingly, while checking out, I was also asked to sign some sort of piece of paper that was spat out along with my receipt. It basically stated (I didn’t get to keep a copy of the document, unfortunately) that I agreed that I had just used-up one of my government coupons, and that I was not going to get the entire purchase price back if I returned the item. I wasn’t really expecting to have to sign anything when paying for an item with cash, but whatever…

The unit is very basic, but does everything that you should need it to do, including allowing you to watch channels that continue to broadcast in analog after February 2009. I’ll have a full product review for you later this week. For the moment though, we suggest that you snatch one up with one of your government coupons while you can. At $49.95, you aren’t going to find a cheaper model anywhere else, and most certainly not one that includes analog pass-through. We’ll have more detailed information on it later this week. Stay tuned!

The below list was compiled from the U.S. Department of Commerce (NTIA), and is current as of January 2008. We’ve added an *asterisk in front of stations licensed in Humboldt, Trinity, Del Norte and Southern Mendocino Counties in Northern California. Keep in mind, these stations all transmit using very little power, so picking up any of them is rather tricky. As far as I know, this is the most comprehensive list of translators available for the area, and the only one that lists network affiliations and the names of the stations that operate invividual translators.

One fact that I find particularly interesting is that we have more LPTV stations and translators in rural Northern California than you will find in any major metropolitan area, such as Los Angeles or San Francisco. In fact, San Francisco seems to only have a single LPTV broadcaster. Also, the localities given do not always seem to reflect the actual location of the translators in all cases. Broadcasters are not required to disclose the “exact” location of their transmitting facilities, which can make it extremely difficult to determine which direction to point you antenna in for the best reception. This is especially true at UHF frequencies (channels 14 and up), where you likely won’t see any signal at all if you don’t aim an antenna in precisely the right direction.

Another interesting factoid is the large number of low-power television stations that have been licensed in the Eureka area. Despite having been granted construction permits, none of the channels currently assigned to “MS Communications” have ever broadcast a signal, to the best of our knowledge. Apparently, MS Communications holds the licenses for literally hundreds of LPTV stations across the country, none of which seem to be operational. It is doubtful that there will ever be any television programming on these stations.

We’ve added comments where appropriate, including network affiliations.

Community Served Station Call Letters Channel ALTADENA KTAV-LP 69 ALTURAS K20DE 20 ALTURAS, ETC. K47EH 47 ALTURAS, ETC. K60AR 60 ANDERSON/CENTRL VAL. K38FQ 38 ARROYO GRANDE KSSY-LP 20 ATASCADERO KASC-CA 7 BAKERSFIELD KTFB-CA 4 BAKERSFIELD K08MM 8 BAKERSFIELD KKEY-LP 11 BAKERSFIELD K18HD 18 BAKERSFIELD K21FP 21 BAKERSFIELD K24GS 24 BAKERSFIELD KBTF-CA 31 BAKERSFIELD KVPT-LP 34 BAKERSFIELD KBFK-LP 36 BAKERSFIELD KNXT-LP 38 BAKERSFIELD KZKC-LP 42 BAKERSFIELD K46II 46 BAKERSFIELD KEBK-LP 47 BAKERSFIELD KABE-LP 52 BAKERSFIELD KBFX-CA 58 BARSTOW KCIO-LP 6 BARSTOW K16GE 16 BARSTOW K28IE 28 * BENBOW, ETC. K12JJ 12 (KAEF Translator) BIEBER, ETC. K06GS 6 BIG BEAR LAKE K06MU 6 BIG BEAR LAKE KPCD-LP 40 BIG BEND, ETC. K04EZ 4 * BLUE LAKE K36BT 36 (KAEF Translator) BLYTHE K24FA 24 BLYTHE K26FS 26 BLYTHE K29EC 29 BLYTHE K31FE 31 BLYTHE K33FD 33 BOONVILLE, ETC. K57CT 57 BOONVILLE, ETC. K59CH 59 BOONVILLE, ETC. K61CH 61 BOONVILLE, ETC. K63CE 63 BOONVILLE, ETC. K67CC 67 BOONVILLE, ETC. K69CU 69 BRIDGEPORT, ETC. K02JX 2 BRIDGEPORT, ETC. K07QM 7 BRIDGEPORT, ETC. K11HS 11 BRIDGEPORT, ETC. K13EX 13 BURNEY, ETC. K05DQ 5 * BURNT RANCH, ETC. K12JL 12 (KIEM Translator) CALEXICO K36FO 36 CATHEDRAL CITY KDPX-LP 45 CATHEDRAL CITY-PALM KPSP-LP 58 CEDARVILLE K71AF 71 CHALFANT VALLEY, ETC K64CY 64 CHALFANT VALLEY,ETC. K55FD 55 CHALFANT VALLEY,ETC. K61EJ 61 CHICO K02OA 2 CHICO KEFM-LP 6 CHICO KXVU-LP 17 CHICO K19FY 19 CHICO KZVU-LP 22 CHICO KUCO-LP 27 CHICO KKPM-CA 28 CHICO KKTF-LP 35 CHICO KBIT-LD 51 CHICO KSGO-LP 59 CHINA LAKE, ETC. K14AT 14 CLARKS CROSSING KDAS-LP 48 * CRESCENT CITY K09VQ 9 (KEET Translator) * CRESCENT CITY, ETC. K22DS 22 (KOBI Translator) * CRESCENT CITY, ETC. K39EO 39 (Daystar Television Network) CROWLEY LAKE-LONG VA K15DP 15 CROWLEY LAKE-LONG VA K17DF 17 CROWLEY LAKE-LONG VA K19DI 19 CROWLEY LAKE-LONG VA K25EB 25 CROWLEY LAKE-LONG VA K27DV 27 CROWLEY LAKE-LONG VA K58BN 58 DAGGETT K15BZ 15 DAGGETT K19BS 19 DAGGETT K41CY 41 DAGGETT K48IP 48 DAGGETT K50HV 50 DAGGETT, ETC. KTSK-LP 17 DAGGETT, ETC. K23BP 23 DAGGETT, ETC. K35BQ 35 DAGGETT, ETC. K39DW 39 DAGGETT, ETC. K46HT 46 DUNSMUIR, ETC. K02CN 2 DUNSMUIR, ETC. K05BR 5 EAGLEVILLE K13IU 13 EAST WEED K33DI 33 EL CENTRO-HOLTVILLE K56GC 56 ETNA-FORT JONES K02HC 2 * EUREKA KUVU-LP 9 (CW Network) * EUREKA ** K27FX 27 * EUREKA KEUV-LP 31 (Univision) * EUREKA KEMY-LP 33 (MyNetwork) * EUREKA ** K41FD 41 * EUREKA ** K48GP 48 * EUREKA ** K50EQ 50 * EUREKA ** K52FK 52 * EUREKA ** K57HB 57 * EUREKA ** K59FW 59 * EUREKA ** K63GK 63 * EUREKA **** K67GU 67 (KKTF-LP Translator) * EUREKA ** K69IE 69 FALL RIVER MILLS,ETC K11JM 11 FALL RIVER MILLS-MCA K28DB 28 FORT BIDWELL K04GB 4 FORT DICK K36HM 36 FORT JONES, ETC. K04EQ 4 FORT JONES, ETC. K06KA 6 FORT JONES, ETC. K13HU 13 * FORTUNA K14MN 14 (KBVU/KTVU Translator) * FORTUNA/RIO DELL K20CN 20 (KAEF Translator) * FRESHWATER, ETC. K45DS 45 (KAEF Translator) FRESNO K03HK 3 FRESNO KVHF-LP 4 FRESNO K12OZ 12 FRESNO K15ET 15 FRESNO KHSC-LP 16 FRESNO KZMM-CA 22 FRESNO KJKZ-LP 27 FRESNO KBID-LP 31 FRESNO KJEO-LP 32 FRESNO KSDI-LP 33 FRESNO KMSG-LP 39 FRESNO KTFF-LP 41 FRESNO K56DZ 56 * GARBERVILLE K10HX 10 (KVIQ Translator) * GARBERVILLE, ETC. K04NX 4 (KIEM Translator) GONZALES KOTR-LP 2 GRASS VALLEY K16CX 16 * GREEN POINT, ETC. K05EQ 5 (KRCR Translator) HAPPY CAMP K07IX 7 HAPPY CAMP, ETC. K09PI 9 HAPPY CAMP, ETC. K11GO 11 HAPPY CAMP, ETC. K13GL 13 * HAYFORK K05CR 5 (KIXE Translator) * HOOPA K07GJ 7 (KIEM Translator) * HOOPA K11NE 11 (KVIQ Translator) HOPLAND K06FA 6 HOPLAND K10FZ 10 HOPLAND K11TD 11 HOPLAND K13ID 13 HOPLAND K35DO 35 INDIO KVER-CA 4 INDIO KEVC-CA 5 INDIO K06MB 6 INDIO KVPS-LP 8 INDIO KUNA-LP 15 INDIO K19DH 19 INDIO K25GW 25 INDIO/PALM SPRINGS KDFX-CA 33 INLAND EMPIRE KHTV-LP 48 INYOKERN K19CL 19 INYOKERN, ETC. K47AE 47 JOSHUA TREE K25GK 25 JOSHUA TREE, ETC. K14JT 14 * KLAMATH K25CI 25 (KAEF Translator) LA JOLLA K35DG 35 LA JOLLA K59AL 59 LA JOLLA K67AM 67 LAKE CITY, ETC. K06FF 6 LAKE SHASTINA K27BH 27 LAKEHEAD K02FF 2 LAKEHEAD K14HX 14 LAKEPORT K15FJ 15 LAKEPORT K26GK 26 LAKEPORT K33CH 33 LAKEPORT K46DR 46 LAKEPORT K54CY 54 LAKEPORT K56AW 56 LAKEPORT K58AW 58 LAKEPORT K64AZ 64 LAKEPORT K68AL 68 LAKEPORT, ETC. K52AJ 52 LAKESHORE, ETC. K04FL 4 LANCASTER K26GN 26 LANCASTER KEDD-LP 50 * LEWISTON K06EX 6 (KHSL Translator) * LEWISTON K28CY 28 (KIXE Translator) * LEWISTON, ETC. K03CT 3 (KRCR Translator) LIKELY K05ET 5 LIKELY K11LD 11 LITCHFIELD K13RZ 13 LITCHFIELD K46HL 46 LITCHFIELD K48DI 48 LITCHFIELD K50HJ 50 LOMPOC K10OG 10 LOMPOC KLDF-CA 17 LOMPOC K23CL 23 LONG VALLEY K05FR 5 LONG VALLEY K49EA 49 LONG VALLEY K56BS 56 LONG VALLEY REGION K60BR 60 LOS ANGELES KVTU-LP 3 LOS ANGELES KNET-LP 25 LOS ANGELES KSMV-LP 33 LOS ANGELES KNLA-LP 68 LUCERNE VALLEY K15CA 15 LUCERNE VALLEY K19BT 19 LUCERNE VALLEY K33DK 33 LUCERNE VALLEY K41CB 41 LUCERNE VALLEY K43EE 43 LUCERNE VALLEY K48AD 48 LUCERNE VALLEY K50EW 50 LUCERNE VALLEY K54AD 54 MAMMOTH LAKES, ETC. KSRW-LP 33 MARIPOSA K27GZ 27 MARTINEZ K49HV 49 MINERAL K05JK 5 * MIRANDA K08LD 8 (KVIQ Translator) * MIRANDA K10NU 10 (KIEM Translator) MODESTO KAZV-LP 14 MODESTO KEXT-CA 27 MODESTO K49EO 49 MODESTO KACA-LP 61 MONTEREY KMUV-LP 23 MONTEREY KYMB-LP 27 MONTEREY KMCE-LP 43 MONTEREY, ETC. K29AB 29 MORENO VALLEY KRMV-LP 45 MORONGO VALLEY KHIR-LP 3 MORONGO VALLEY K13WJ 13 MORONGO VALLEY K14AB 14 MORONGO VALLEY K16AA 16 MORONGO VALLEY KJHP-LP 18 MORONGO VALLEY K21GI 21 MORONGO VALLEY K30GU 30 MORONGO VALLEY K32EM 32 MORONGO VALLEY K34EU 34 MORONGO VALLEY K36GO 36 MORONGO VALLEY K40HX 40 MORONGO VALLEY K48EM 48 MORRO BAY K09UF 9 MORRO BAY K22EE 22 MOUNTAIN GATE, ETC. K03FU 3 NATIONAL CITY K61GH 61 NEEDLES K30BQ 30 NEEDLES, ETC. K17BN 17 NEEDLES, ETC. K31HY 31 NEWBERRY SPRINGS K03EK 3 NEWBERRY SPRINGS K06IQ 6 NEWBERRY SPRINGS K08IA 8 NEWBERRY SPRINGS K10IX 10 NEWBERRY SPRINGS K12JI 12 NEWELL, TULELAKE K13IV 13 * ORLEANS K08HJ 8 (KVIQ Translator) * ORLEANS K11IQ 11 (KIEM Translator) OROVILLE K08NH 8 OROVILLE K15CX 15 OROVILLE K42HL 42 OXNARD KSKP-CA 25 PALERMO K04QC 4 PALM DESERT KDUO-LP 43 PALM DESERT, ETC. K09XW 9 PALM SPRINGS KCWQ-LP 2 PALM SPRINGS KYAV-LP 12 PALM SPRINGS KODG-LP 17 PALM SPRINGS K20HZ 20 PALM SPRINGS KVES-LP 28 PALM SPRINGS K40ID 40 PALM SPRINGS KPSE-LP 50 PALM SPRINGS DK77AV 77 PALM SPRINGS/INDIO K21DO 21 PALMDALE KPAL-LP 38 PALMDALE K67AO 67 PARADISE K05EM 5 PARADISE K49CT 49 PASO ROBLES K17GD 17 PASO ROBLES KPAO-CA 22 PASO ROBLES K23ED 23 PASO ROBLES KJCN-LP 36 PASO ROBLES K44DN 44 PORTERVILLE K15CO 15 PORTERVILLE KVVG-LP 54 POTTER VALLEY K06DK 6 POTTER VALLEY K08EE 8 POTTER VALLEY K10EQ 10 POTTER VALLEY K12DV 12 POTTER VALLEY K66DQ 66 POTTER VALLEY K69DI 69 POWAY, ETC. KUAN-LP 48 REDDING KMCA-LP 2 REDDING KVFR-LP 4 REDDING KRDN-LP 5 REDDING KFMD-LP 6 REDDING KRVU-LP 21 REDDING KGEC-LP 26 REDDING KMSX-LP 29 REDDING K33HH 33 REDDING K40HE 40 REDDING K46HI 46 REDDING KRDT-CA 47 REDDING K50GP 50 REDDING KRHT-LP 58 REDLANDS KLAU-LP 66 REEDLEY KCWB-LP 13 RIDGECREST K41GO 41 RIDGECREST K43AG 43 RIDGECREST K45GQ 45 RIDGECREST, ETC. K02HY 2 RIDGECREST, ETC. K04HX 4 RIDGECREST, ETC. K05FO 5 RIDGECREST, ETC. K07NH 7 RIDGECREST, ETC. K09MG 9 RIDGECREST, ETC. K11ML 11 RIDGECREST, ETC. K13NF 13 RIDGECREST, ETC. K49AA 49 RIDGECREST, ETC. K51DD 51 RIDGECREST, ETC. K53AB 53 RIDGECREST, ETC. K55AB 55 RIDGECREST, ETC. K57AK 57 RIDGECREST, ETC. K59AO 59 * RIO DELL K04NY 4 (KIEM Translator) * RIO DELL, SCOTIA K10FS 10 (KVIQ Translator) RIVERSIDE KZSW-LP 27 SACRAMENTO KBTV-CA 8 SACRAMENTO KMMK-LP 14 SACRAMENTO KMUM-CA 15 SACRAMENTO K22FR 22 SACRAMENTO KEZT-CA 23 SACRAMENTO K27EU 27 SACRAMENTO KSTV-LP 32 SACRAMENTO KCSO-LP 33 SACRAMENTO K45HC 45 SACRAMENTO KRJR-LP 47 SACRAMENTO KSAO-LP 49 SALINAS KMMD-CA 3 SALINAS K15CU 15 SALINAS KLFB-LP 21 SALINAS K38JP 38 SALINAS/MONTEREY,ETC KDJT-CA 33 SAN BERNARDINO KSGA-LP 64 SAN DIEGO KBNT-CA 17 SAN DIEGO KDTF-LP 36 SAN DIEGO KZSD-LP 41 SAN DIEGO KBOP-CA 43 SAN DIEGO KTCD-LP 46 SAN DIEGO K63EN 63 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY KSFV-LP 26 SAN FRANCISCO KMMC-LP 40 SAN FRANCISCO, ETC. KFTL-CA 28 SAN LUIS OBISPO K16FC 16 SAN LUIS OBISPO KMMA-CA 18 SAN LUIS OBISPO KKFX-CA 24 SAN LUIS OBISPO K28FK 28 SAN LUIS OBISPO KSBO-CA 42 SAN LUIS OBISPO KFUL-LP 44 SAN LUIS OBISPO K47GD 47 SAN LUIS OBISPO KCCE-LP 50 SAN LUIS OBISPO KPXA-LP 60 SAN LUIS OBISPO,ETC. K57BC 57 SAN MARCOS KSKT-CA 43 SANTA BARBARA KZDF-LP 8 SANTA BARBARA KSBB-LP 17 SANTA BARBARA KWHY-LP 22 SANTA BARBARA K26FT 26 SANTA BARBARA KVMM-CA 41 SANTA BARBARA KTSB-LP 43 SANTA BARBARA KBAB-LP 51 SANTA BARBARA K59CD 59 SANTA BARBARA, ETC. K28GY 28 SANTA CLARA-SAN JOSE KAXT-CA 22 SANTA MARIA K07TA 7 SANTA MARIA KKDJ-LP 8 SANTA MARIA KQMM-CA 14 SANTA MARIA KLFA-LP 25 SANTA MARIA KDFS-CA 30 SANTA MARIA K35ER 35 SANTA MARIA KWSM-LP 40 SANTA MARIA K46GF 46 SANTA MARIA K51GB 51 SANTA ROSA K25HI 25 SANTA ROSA KDTV-CA 28 SANTA ROSA KTVJ-LP 36 SANTA ROSA KQRM-LP 40 SEIAD VALLEY K04NU 4 SEIAD VALLEY K08EQ 8 SEIAD VALLEY K12JD 12 * SHELTER COVE K02OD 2 (KIEM Translator) * SHELTER COVE K10KY 10 KVIQ Translator) * SHELTER COVE K12OV 12 (KEET Translator) * SOUTH EUREKA/LOLETA K51EG 51 (KAEF Translator) SOUTH LAKE TAHOE K12PP 12 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE K33CN 33 SOUTH YREKA K47DV 47 STATELINE, ETC. K43DB 43 STOCKTON KMMW-LP 47 STOCKTON KDTS-LP 52 SUSANVILLE KREN-LP 29 SUSANVILLE, ETC. K36HH 36 SUSANVILLE, ETC. K42GV 42 SUSANVILLE, ETC. K61EN 61 SUSANVILLE, ETC. K63CM 63 SUSANVILLE, ETC. K69FS 69 SUSANVILLE-HERLONG K59ET 59 SWAUGER CREEK K51CP 51 SWAUGER CREEK K54CX 54 TAHOE CITY K23DT 23 TAHOE CITY K56BW 56 TEMECULA K12PO 12 * TRINITY CENTER K39DG 39 (KIXE Translator) TWENTYNINE PALMS K18FH 18 TWENTYNINE PALMS K38EE 38 TWENTYNINE PALMS, ET K51DU 51 TWENTYNINE PALMS,ETC K16FI 16 TWENTYNINE PALMS,ETC K29GK 29 TWENTYNINE PALMS,ETC K47IB 47 TWENTYNINE PALMS,ETC K49DC 49 UKIAH K17CG 17 UKIAH K21CD 21 UKIAH K27EE 27 UKIAH K29DF 29 UKIAH K31GK 31 UKIAH K39AG 39 UKIAH K41AF 41 UKIAH K43AF 43 UKIAH KTJH-LP 44 UKIAH K45AH 45 UKIAH K47AL 47 UKIAH K51AQ 51 UKIAH K55GX 55 UKIAH K69DF 69 VAN NUYS KWJD-LP 25 VAN NUYS KSKJ-CA 38 VAN NUYS K55KD 55 VENTURA KIMG-LP 23 VENTURA K45DU 45 VICTORVILLE K39GY 39 VICTORVILLE K47CC 47 VICTORVILLE, ETC. K21AC 21 VICTORVILLE, ETC. K25AD 25 VICTORVILLE, ETC. K27AE 27 VICTORVILLE, ETC. K31AD 31 VICTORVILLE, ETC. K51AN 51 VICTORVILLE, ETC. K55CW 55 VISALIA KFAZ-CA 8 VISALIA KMCF-LP 35 VISTA K26FA 26 VISTA KHAX-LP 49 * WEAVERVILLE, ETC. K02EE 2 (KIXE Translator) * WEAVERVILLE, ETC. K04DD 4 (KHSL Translator) * WEAVERVILLE, ETC. K05CF 5 (KRCR Translator) WESTWOOD, ETC. K54EE 54 * WILLOW CREEK K08GR 8 (KIEM Translator) * WILLOW CREEK K10EN 10 (KVIQ Translator) * WILLOW CREEK K34BW 34 (KRCR Translator) YREKA K06GP 6 YREKA K41JB 41 YREKA K53DY 53 YREKA, ETC. K04HE 4 YREKA, ETC. K13LO 13 YREKA, ETC. K17BA 17 YREKA, ETC. K35DE 35 YUCCA VALLEY K27DS 27 Source: Stations licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, January 23, 2008
		Home En Español Consumers Retailers Manufacturers Partners Rules Administration What’s New Digital TV & Public Safety Act Home Press Releases Contact Us More Information • Additional Links • Privacy Policy • FOIA Information • Information Quality • Accessibility • Adobe Acrobat Reader

** Also listed, but unable to confirm:

K13MD Channel 13 Hyampom (KIEM Translator?)

k09PM Channel 9 Covelo (KEET Translator?)

K09MS Channel 9 Hoopa (KEET Translator?)

K04EM Channel 4 Hayfork (KRCR Translator?)

K05FZ Channel 5 Trinity Center (KRCR Translator?)

K05EX Channel 5 Burnt Ranch (KRCR Translator?)

*** Construction permit applied for by MS Communications, Inc. No word on what, if anything, will eventually be on these channels. Channels currently vacant.

**** Supposedly belongs to KKTF-LP, a Spanish language broadcaster in Chico, which plans to offer Telefutura. Currently vacant.

Whether you are shopping locally, or online, the story seems to be the same. Even online retailers who have attempted to carry every single converter model manufactured today have a harder time keeping these things in stock than Ticketmaster does holding on to tickets for a Hannah Montana concert.

The few converters that linger on the shelevs of electronics retailers seem to fall into one of two categories. The first category consists of DTV converters that are wildly overpriced compared to the competition. Since there are few differences between a top-of-the-line DTV converter box and a generic, no frills unit, consumers seem hesitatnt to shell out twice as much money for a product that is no better than cheaper units that are constantly out of stock. Can you really blame them?

The second category of DTV converters still available are ones that we will label as “functionally obsolete”. Even though they are priced the same as more capable units, these DTV converters lack the basic functionality needed to continue watching existing television stations in most U.S. markets after February 2009, or even today. In particular, their lack of ability to pass-through analog TV signals makes them only slightly more useful than a paperweight in communities like Humboldt County, where close to half of all stations will continue broadcasting in analog long after February 2009 has passed.

So, why are so many of these “duds” left in stock, while the “functional” models are in short supply? You can bet that it all has to do with money. It costs slightly less to manufacture the cheaper converters with fewer features. Because these units sell for about the same retail price as their superior quality counterparts, retailers make much more money on the cheaper units. Most retailer pre-orders have been for the the low-end units, and the industry has accordingly followed suit, leaving consumers with few decent models to choose from. The small number of consumers actually buying these units today are informed enough to snatch-up the good models while they are stock, leaving the shelves littered with converters that no one would ever purposefully want to buy. This has led to quite a bit of “bait and switch” selling by retailers, who either believe that the public is too stupid to know what features to look for or have sales associates that are too dumb to know themselves just how worthless these products will be to their new owners.

We had hoped to bring you a product review this week on a very decent, low-priced DTV converter box that was advertised at a national chain store this past week. Unfortunately, by the time we arrived, they were all gone. Assuming that they will ever be back in stock, we will attempt to do a full product review and provide you with information on where to get the best possible deal on them. Stay tuned!

There are actually quite a number of requirements you must meet in order to use the new service, which offers movies, news clips, documentaries and other content that is recorded directly to a customer’s DVR.

First off, DirecTV customers must lease a combination DirecTV receiver and DVR and subscribe to programming with DVR service. Downloading of any HD content requires the lease of a DirecTV HD-DVR, along with a subscription to their DVR service and HDTV programming option. DirecTV charges its customers an extra $9.95 per month in order to have access to any HDTV programming. This is in addition to normal programming subscription fees. The customer obviously must also have an HDTV capable television or converter box in order to view any HDTV content. Next, you will need access to a broadband Internet connection, as all Video On Demand content is actually downloaded via the Internet, rather than being received via satellite.

The service claims to currently have up to 4,000 titles available for download. This may sound like a lot, but actually looks pretty paltry when compared to the thousands of hours of programming available to DirecTV subscribers, who can already use their DVRs to schedule recordings months ahead of time. DirecTV was also the first programming provider to make its DVR features available to control via the Internet or cellphone, allowing customers to choose what they want to record from almost anywhere. DirecTV is offering this as a “free” addition to their regular programming, so it doesn’t cost anything extra to those who already have the above mentioned services.

Installation

Setup for the service is very straightforward if you already have normal DirecTV service up-and-running. An Ethernet port built into the back of most late model DirecTV receivers plugs directly into your broadband router. It will work using DHCP detection or can be programmed to use a static IP address. I was able to have the service activated and working in less than 5 minutes. It will likely take you longer if you don’t already have an Ethernet port available near your TV set. It is also possible to use a wireless broadband router in order to provide your receiver/DVR with Internet access. However, I would not recommend it due to the high transfer speeds and associated bandwidth bottleneck it would create on your network.

Once activated, you simply use your remote control to surf to channel 1000. From there, you are taken into a sub-menu, where you can browse programming by content type, genre or by individual channels. A number of networks such as The History Channel, HBO and Comedy Central have their own sub-sub-menus, which allows you to view all available VOD programming available from their respective networks.

The Bad News

Up until this point, I was pretty impressed with what I saw. It was only after I started taking a close look at what programming was available that I began to wonder whether this new service was really worth the effort. The most disappointing aspect of the service, by far, is the large number of movie titles that are only available via pay-per-view. From an economic perspective, this certainly makes sense. DirecTV isn’t making any “extra” money on this, unless you pay extra, so they have to have some type of “value added” programming. Still, the breadth and width of movies and TV programs that are classified as pay-per-view is rather staggering. Some of the movies on PPV are 20 or even 30 years old, and have been shown on network television for free on many occasions. Some network programmers, such as NBC, have also started charging for content that you can normally view for free. Personally, I find it rather insulting being asked to pay $1.99 just to watch a re-run of a network TV show. That’s just me though.

Another let down was the fact that there is no ability to sort through programming based upon what channels you already subscribe to. For example, almost all movies that do not fall into the PPV category are on premium movie channels like STARZ, HBO, Showtime, TMC, Cinemax, etc. Those listings will appear, even if you don’t subscribe to them. So, anyone browsing through the “movies” category that does not subscribe to DirecTV’s most expensive programming packages (which can easily run you well over $100 per month) will find very little that is available to them without paying extra.

Another disappointment is the lack of HDTV programming available to subscribers. Only a small percentage of DirecTV’s overall HDTV content is available via its VOD service. This is likely due to the high cost of bandwidth for transmitting HDTV content across the Internet. Even at broadband speeds, HDTV programs seem to take forever to download. It’s standard definition programming does not transfer all that quickly either. Even with the full bandwidth of a commercial T1 connection, waiting for features to complete downloading can be like watching a teapot and waiting for the water to boil. This is quite obviously not a real-time type of service. It’s nice for scheduling things to download well ahead of when you want to watch them, but not if you want to watch them immediately.

The Good News

The reason that titles take so long to download using this service can easily be justified by watching the final product. Since you are actually downloading an MPEG4 file, which is the same type of compression method used to transmit their programming via satellite, the quality of picture you will receive from their Video On Demand service is literally indistinguishable from DirecTV’s regular programming. In fact, other than the “VOD” label that shows-up next to each title, there is almost no way of telling the difference between programming you have recorded via satellite and VOD titles that you have downloaded over the Internet. They all appear right together when viewing a list of your recorded content.

One benefit of using DirecTV’s VOD service to download titles, rather than recording them to your DVR the traditional way, is that most titles currently have few, if any, commercial interruptions. So, DVR users who are used to hitting the fast-forward button to skip through commercials on recorded content can finally give their fingers a rest. Most shows have been re-edited to include a limited number of commercials, most of them being “teaser” ads for other network shows. It actually makes some network programming tolerable to sit through.

There is also a slew of exclusive content available to DirecTV VOD subscribers. Most of the titles we ran across were compiled by sources such as CNN. They have quite a number of interviews and short segments available that never quite made it on to their regular broadcasts. The presentation style seems to be much more laid-back than you would expect from some of these programmers. You are just as likely to see interviewers wearing a T-Shirt as a tie. I’m guessing that a large number of these shows will never see the light of day on regular television. The same can be said for many of the short clips you will find for reality shows and documentaries on other channels. There are a large number of outtakes, bloopers and other material that normally would never have gone any further than the cutting room floor. Enjoy it while you can. Once the mass public starts watching these services, we doubt that this type of programming will show-up anyplace other than YouTube.

Programming Pros and Cons

The programming you will find available from different programmers might not exactly be what one would expect. While some channels provide a wide array of programming that substantially duplicates what is available on their regular video channels, others provide only a small glimpse of what is available. For instance, while you will find a very good assortment of commercial-free movies available to you from HBO and Showtime (if you also subscribe to their premium movie services), you will find that others such as American Movie Classics don’t make ANY movies available for download. As for sports programming, you won’t find any. None of the national or regional sports channels have video on demand programming. Period. You will need to rely upon traditional DVR recording to catch any sporting events, unless they happen to be on pay-per-view.

Another programming oddity lies in the ability to download clips from some shows, but being unable to download the entire show. For example, while a number of clips from Comedy Central’s “Roast” series are often available for VOD download, you won’t be able to find entire shows from the series for download.

Probably the most frustrating thing for me is the inability to distinguish which programming is available to me as as a subscriber, and which isn’t. You won’t be able to download any programming from HBO’s Video On Demand service unless you subscribe to HBO, which makes sense. However, there are quite a few Video On Demand channels in the menu that I don’t even recognize. Some of these include The Smithsonian Channel, The Anime Network, Eurocinema, Film Festival, MGM, SONY, Warner Brothers, WWE, etc. New ones seem to be added all of the time. How do you know if you will be allowed to download programs on these channels or not? You won’t. You are seemingly allowed to schedule recordings on every channel that appears. If you are “eligible” to receive programming on these channels, the program will be downloaded for you. If you are not, the program will simply never appear. Seriously! There are no error messages or other menu help to clue you in on what you are allowed to download. Other than that, and perhaps your own memory (who can remember an exact list of the 200+ available channels that they subscribe to?), there is seemingly no way to tell which programs you are allowed to record, and which you aren’t.

The Bottom Line

Despite a number of programming “quirks”, if you already have DVR service with DirecTV and a broadband connection, this one really is a no-brainer. There is no extra cost involved and it takes only minutes to get up-and-running. The number of titles is limited at the moment, but everything we have read would tend to indicate that much, much more programming is on the way. While the service is definitely not something that would make me want to rush out and subscribe to DirecTV if I didn’t already have it, the superior programming, picture quality and customer service you will get as compared to cable is more than enough reason to make the switch.

DirecTV’s VOD service is a win-win situation for DirecTV, the programmers and consumers. If you don’t already have DirecTV, this is just another reason to make the switch from cable. I’ve been subscribing to DirecTV for well over 10 years now, and you couldn’t pay me to go back to cable. For those of you who have to have “everything” when it comes to television, this is about as close as you can get to TV Nirvana at the moment. If you can’t find something worth viewing with DirecTV HDTV service and video on demand, there truly is nothing to watch!

Update: This is just a brief update to the original article that I wrote above in 2008. Since I originally started viewing DirecTV’s Video On Demand (VOD) service, some additional technical issues have come to light. For starters, it seems that the original HR-22 HD-DVR receiver I started out with was a true lemon. It suffered from numerous “technical difficulties” during the few months that I owned it and finally had to be returned to the factory for replacement. I was sent a slightly updated version of the HR-22, which seems to have undergone some slight cosmetic as well as internal changes.

The cause of the old HR-22 having to be replaced was fairly obvious to me… a crashed hard drive. Unfortunately, I lost all of the pre-recoded content I had saved, including a number of pay-per-view events. The big loss here is due to the fact that DirecTV no longer allows you to save these events as long as you want on your DVR. They automatically “expire” after a certain amount of time, just as all DirecTV Video On Demand content eventually does.

As a side note, I had to pay a $20 shipping and handling charge to get the receiver replaced, even though it is technically a rented product. I have never understood DirecTV’s rental scheme. First, I had to pay $200 to (I thought) BUY the receiver. I didn’t sign any agreement saying that I agreed to “rent” the thing. After that, I have to pay an extra $5 per month to “rent” the HD-DVR FOREVER! To add insult to injury, activating the receiver that I paid $200 for puts me on the hook for the next TWO YEARS to pay an extra $10 a month for access to HD programming, whether you are able to view it or not. Strangely, DirecTV also gives you the option to pay another $6.95 per month for “insurance”, just in case you need help with a defective product of theirs. This seems more like the kind of scam that the cable companies or DISH Network would think of. It’s one of the few things about DirecTV that I really find myself insulted by, as a consumer.

On to more technical matters… I have found that not all video quality is created equal, when it comes to DirecTV’s Video On Demand service. Some “channels” on the VOD system seem of much higher quality than others. In particular, STARZ offers a huge selection of movies for download to those who purchase their service on DirecTV. Far more than any of the other premium movie channels. There’s just one problem… the video quality of their titles in standard resolution can be nearly unwatchable. I downloaded quite a number of STARZ movies on VOD that I had to quit watching after a few minutes, due to their awful video quality (or lack thereof). The problem was always the same. Video contained washed-out colors and blurry images. The blurriness was bad enough that it was difficult, if not impossible, to read any text that appeared in movie scenes. The quality difference was clearly visible when comparing it to the video on any standard resolution DirecTV channel.

Generally, poor video quality like this is usually the result of over-compression. That is, STARZ and/or DirecTV is likely trying to save money on bandwidth by purposefully reducing the picture quality in order to achieve faster download times. There really is no technical way to quantify the difference, due to the proprietary nature of DirecTV’s encoding system. However, the results are quite obvious to anyone that does not have severely impaired vision.

Another small “quirk” of DirecTV’s Video On Demand Service relates to volume control. For some reason, the audio levels of all programming downloaded via video on demand is significantly lower than that of DirecTV’s live, satellite programming. Unless you adjust the volume when switching from live satellite to video on demand, you will have a very difficult time hearing anything. Conversely, switching from video on demand titles to the live satellite feed will likely result in sound levels being so high as to severely annoy your next door neighbors. If you are unlucky enough to switch from a video on demand title to a live DirecTV channel during a commercial, you could be in for a very rude awakening, indeed. DirecTV raises audio levels during certain commercials so high as to make me worry about permanent hearing loss. The Federal Communications Commission bans this type of practice by over-the-air broadcasters, but it seems that DirecTV is immune from these regulations.

Speaking of which, I must admit that I no longer watch ANY DirecTV programming (that has commercials) in real-time, with the sole exception of news and some sports programming. Their blatant disregard for public safety by jacking up audio levels during their own commercials has finally pushed me to the point where I refuse to sit through ANY commercials on their service. Unless it’s a live event, I simply pre-record programs to my HD-DVR, then watch them later. I skip through ALL commercials using the fast forward button. It’s obvious that DirecTV itself is the one behind this, since the problem is worst during their own in-house ads. Some of these spots are promos for DirecTV, while others are simply those that they sell to other advertisers during time slots made available to them by the basic cable channels that they carry. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to know when or where these ads will appear, so I am simply forced to stop watching all ads that appear anywhere on DirecTV, or order to avoid the pain and suffering that results from the outrageously high volume levels of DirecTV’s ads.

So, a note to those companies that advertise on any of the networks carried by DirecTV. I DO NOT WATCH YOUR COMMERCIALS. EVER. IF YOU ARE PAYING DIRECTV FOR “ADVERTISING”, YOU WARE WASTING YOUR MONEY. As long as DirecTV continues their current eardrum torturing scheme, I will continue “boycotting” their advertisers. Not that DirecTV is the only company guilty of this. Most cable systems do the same thing. It doesn’t mean that I have to put up with it though.

Much to their credit, the paper made a point to mention the sorry state of affairs when it comes to trying to find DTV converters in local stores, and how retailers seem to never have them in stock for very long. The Eureka Reporter gets double bonus points for going out of their way to point out how important buying a DTV converter with analog pass-through is. For once, someone in the media seems to “get it”, when it comes to understanding what a big problem this is for small communities such as ours. I just wish that more of the mainstream media would start picking-up on this story, and start warning people away from the vast majority of digital converters out there that will result in loss of TV service availability to their users.

For those of you who haven’t read the article yet, we highly recommend that you read last week’s story Don’t Buy These Converter Boxes. It points out what features your box will need to have in order to be able to watch ALL local channels on your TV set after February 2009.

In the next couple of days we will be publishing a first look at DirecTV’s new Video On Demand (VOD) service, which uses your high-speed Internet connection to automatically record your choice of thousands of programs directly to your DVR (digital video recorder). All movies, news clips, documentaries, etc. are available exclusively to DirecTV customers who subscribe to the company’s HDTV service. It’s quite likely an even better advancement in TV viewing than HDTV service itself, and probably the neatest TV innovation since TiVo. Stay tuned!